Perspectives on Membrane Bioreactor Potential for Treatment of Pulp and Paper Industry Wastewater : A Critical Review

The wastewater produced by industry has a significant impact on the environment. The pulp and paper industry discharges a huge amount of highly polluted wastewater and is facing challenges to meet stringent environmental regulations. Factories commonly produce great amounts of wastewater, which has a high chemical oxygen demand (COD), toxicity, a low biodegradability and more than 700 organic and inorganic compounds (Table 1) depending on some factors, such as raw material type and production process. There are various special types of pollutants in this wastewater, including lignins, phenols, chlorides, stilbenes, dioxins, furans and sulphur compounds. After primary metals and chemicals industries, the pulp and paper industry produces the third largest amount of wastewater.1-3 The water used in pulp and paper factories ranges from 5-100 m3/t depending on the characteristics of the raw material, type of produced paper and the value of water reuse.4 Contaminants which are produced during process of pulp and paper production can be reduced remarkably by adopting several internal process improvements in combination with management measures. In this respect, European Commission has described the best available techniques to be adopted by pulp and paper factories. Furthermore, several studies have been conducted with the purpose of reduction in the pollution load during the pulp and paper making process.13,14 The purpose of this review is to collate the results, data and information from recent research studies performed on the treatment of pulp and paper wastewater using MBR technologies. The results are critically compared and analyzed to establish some important recommendations and conclusions.


Introduction
The wastewater produced by industry has a significant impact on the environment.The pulp and paper industry discharges a huge amount of highly polluted wastewater and is facing challenges to meet stringent environmental regulations.Factories commonly produce great amounts of wastewater, which has a high chemical oxygen demand (COD), toxicity, a low biodegradability and more than 700 organic and inorganic compounds (Table 1) depending on some factors, such as raw material type and production process.There are various special types of pollutants in this wastewater, including lignins, phenols, chlorides, stilbenes, dioxins, furans and sulphur compounds.2][3] The water used in pulp and paper factories ranges from 5-100 m 3 /t depending on the characteristics of the raw material, type of produced paper and the value of water reuse. 4ontaminants which are produced during process of pulp and paper production can be reduced remarkably by adopting several internal process improvements in combination with management measures.In this respect, European Commission has described the best available techniques to be adopted by pulp and paper factories.Furthermore, several studies have been conducted with the purpose of reduction in the pollution load during the pulp and paper making process. 13,14he purpose of this review is to collate the results, data and information from recent research studies performed on the treatment of pulp and paper wastewater using MBR technologies.The results are critically compared and analyzed to establish some important recommendations and conclusions.
from 500-1000 m 3 to 13 m 3 . 20Generally, wastewater of pulp and paper produced from virgin fiber consists of high levels of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and COD with wood debris and soluble wood materials, various toxic chemicals, such as resin acids, unsaturated fatty acids (such as oleic acids and linoleic acid), di-terpene alcohols, chlorinated resin acids and so on. 3,18stewater of Pulp and Paper Produced From Recovered Fibers Recently, recycling of waste papers such as mixed office waste, old newsprint and old corrugated container has been increasingly used because of environmental and economic benefits.Saving natural resources and reducing solid waste generation can be mentioned as the main reasons of such recycling methods. 21iber recovery can be mainly classified into pulping process, high density screening and deinking steps.Pulping is generally used to convert the waste paper into the recovered fibers dispersed in water and to prepare them for deinking, which removes the ink particles from cellulose fibers.Screening eliminates large particles with high and medium density, such as paper clips and staples.Deinking can be considered as the main step of the recovered fibers recycling process, which chiefly consists of separating of ink particles from the cellulose fibers by washing those of less than 25 mm diameter or floating larger particles such as toner inks and laser printed papers. 22,23Toxic substances, such as H 2 O 2 , NaOH, Na 2 SiO 3 , Na 2 CO 3 and other compounds are currently used as chemical deinking agents with the purpose of brightness improvement of the recycled pulp. 24enerally, impurities such as sand, glass, plastic, coatings and fillers are separated from waste papers during recycling process.In addition, high concentrations of surfactants in paints and printing ink can be released into the wastewater during paper recycling process.Furthermore, pollutants such as CP additives including caustic soda, sodium silicate and hydrogen peroxide, deinking additives, ink particles and other impurities such as fines and fillers are normally produced in fiber recycling mills. 25,26Therefore, paperrecycling wastewater is a complex mixture including toxic and recalcitrant substances, indicating complexity and difficulty

Pulp and Paper Industry Wastewater Treatment Technologies
Regardless of various wastewater treatment techniques, such pollutants mentioned earlier have been found in the final treated effluents due to incomplete degradation and economic limitations of some effective pulp and paper wastewater treatment techniques. 28In an overall view, pulp and paper wastewater treatment techniques are divided into physicochemical and biological treatment methods.Physicochemical treatment methods, such as coagulationflocculation, reverse osmosis (RO), adsorption and oxidation have been well used because of their performance in the removal of a variety of contaminants from the pulp and paper wastewater.Generally, biological treatment methods consisting of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, algae and enzymes have been coupled with other physicochemical methods.Biological methods compared with physicochemical wastewater treatment methods are considered to be cost effective and ecofriendly.However, the conventional biological processes have not been effectively performed for removing color and recalcitrant compounds from pulp and paper mill wastewater. 15,29,30Various toxic chemicals such as resin acids, unsaturated fatty acids, alcohols and chlorinated resin acids are produced in the pulp and paper industry, and therefore, this variety of pollutants provide a significant challenge for traditional biological treatment such as activated sludge (AS).2][33] Table 2 shows the performance of aerobic, anaerobic and hybrid treatment processes for different types of pulp and paper wastewater.

MBR Processes
MBR systems essentially consist of a combination of biological reactor coupled with membrane units for biodegradation and physical separation of the waste compounds.The first reported application of membrane reactor was in 1969, when an ultrafiltration membrane was used to separate AS from the effluent of a biological wastewater treatment system. 35This technology can produce clarified, high-quality and largely disinfected effluent, offering the possibility of water reclamation.It has been used for treating many kinds of wastewater, such as municipal, [36][37][38][39] high strength wastewater, [40][41][42] food industry, 43,44 pharmaceutical, [45][46][47] tannery 48,49 and other types of wastewater.
There are two types of operations, namely cross-flow and dead-end, which have been shown in Figure 1(a) and (b).These operations need to be performed in the presence of pressure drive.Basically, cross-flow filtration is carried out by using hollow fiber (HF), flat sheet (FS) or multi tubular (MT).This type of filtration can reduce the formatting of the cake layer on the surface of the membrane.In dead-end operation, the solids from the feed, which are larger than the pore size, are easier to accumulation on the membrane surface, and generally, this type of filtration is in batch process. 50enerally, configurations of MBR systems are external/ side-stream, submerged/immersed and airlift as shown in Figure 2. In external configuration, membrane module is placed outside the bioreactor and consists of the mixed liquor recirculation through a membrane module (Figure 2a).This configuration provides more direct hydrodynamic control of membrane fouling and has the advantages of easier membrane replacement and high fluxes. 52,53n submerged configuration, membrane modules are in the mixed liquor and the driving force across the membrane is provided by creating negative pressure on the permeate side (Figure 2b).Some advantages of submerged MBR include its much lower energy consumption and less rigorous cleaning procedure. 54,55One of the latest MBR configurations is airlift side stream MBR.The concept applies the side-stream airlift principle using a reliable side stream configuration while incorporating all the advantages of the submerged systems  (Figure 2c). 56,57urthermore, in recent years, some new advanced MBR configurations have been used, which own various advantages.For example, draft tube internal loop airlift bioreactor has been used for hydrodynamic investigations and oxygen transfer behavior of water in diesel micro emulsions. 58An external loop airlift membrane bioreactor (ELAMBR) was used for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment and its performance was analyzed.The long-term stability of operational system and the effects of solids retention time (SRT) on the contaminant removal efficiency were studied.The results showed that the initial concentration of the contaminants, COD and mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) are the most effective parameters in removal of pollutants.ELAMBR had advantages such as simple operation and maintenance, efficient removal of pollutant and low-energy consumption. 59n addition, an MBR has been used as a pretreatment step before RO in order to reuse industrial town wastewater.The results indicated that MBR produces a high quality permeate water.Approximately, 75%, 98% and 74% removal of COD, TSS and TN were recorded respectively and also silt density index of the permeate effluent was below 3 most of the time. 60he hybrid electro membrane bioreactor (HEMBR) was used for pretreatment of RO and advanced treatment of effluent by simultaneous integration electrical coagulation with an MBR.Results demonstrated that suspended solids (SS) removal efficiency is almost 100% for HEMBR and MBR.HEMBR removal of COD improved by 4% and membrane fouling was reduced according to transmembrane pressure (TMP).The silt density index of HEMBR permeate samples was slightly better, indicating less RO membrane fouling.Furthermore, according to the SVI comparison of MBR and HEMBR biomass samples, HEMBR showed better settling characteristics, enhancing the dewaterability and filterability of the sludge. 61n innovative MBR consisting of two anoxic bioreactors followed by an aerated MBR, UV unit and a granular activated carbon (GAC) filter were applied for the treatment of dye.Once the biological system was adapted, 95% of dye, 99% of COD, 97% of nitrogen and 73% of phosphorus were removed at a retention time of 74.4 hours.Moreover, for complete dye removing, MBR effluent was passed through the UV-unit and GAC filter. 62The SMB-OsMBR hybrid system, combining of sponge-based moving bed (SMB) and an osmotic MBR (OsMBR) were studied using Triton X-114 surfactant coupled with MgCl 2 salt as the draw solution.In comparison with OsMBR, the SMB-OsMBR system due to the thick-biofilm layer on sponge carriers was able to remove more nutrients and less membrane fouling was observed.The nutrient removal efficiency of the proposed system was close to 100%, confirming the effectiveness of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in the biofilm layer on sponge carriers. 63

Membrane Characteristics
Generally, membrane performance relates to the size of membrane pores, membrane materials, MBR processes configuration, wastewater type, solubility and retention time.Retention occurs due to the concentration change between the retentate and permeates.The important parameters in MBR operation are permeability, flux, TMP and resistance.Permeability is defined as flux per pressure (J/ΔP) or LMH/ ΔkPa.Flux (LMH) is the permeate flow per unit area of membrane and depends on hydraulic resistance, thickness of the membrane or cake layer and driving force.Driving force is the gradient of membrane potential area of mass transport involving pressure and concentration of particles.The mass transport mechanism for the membrane depends on the materials and structure of the membrane. 64he size of contaminants is an effective parameter in the selection of membrane type.Generally, microfiltration (MF) is used for removing suspended solids with the particle size in the range of 100-1000 nm, ultrafiltration (UF) for a particle with 5-100 nm size and nanofiltration (NF) for particles with 1-5 nm size.Most of the treatment plants use MF or UF regarding the fouling and cost factors. 52,65,66olymers and ceramics are two types of materials that are chiefly used to construct the membranes.Generally, ceramic membranes have higher hydrophilic ability and a good performance in filtration compared to polymeric ones due to their high chemical resistance, inertness and easiness of cleaning, and are applied in industrial wastewater treatment; however, they suffer some drawbacks including expensive fabrication and fragility. 67,68uitable polymeric materials which have been widely used include polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyethersulfone (PES), polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) because of appropriate physical and chemical resistance.PVDF is the most prevalent membrane material, accounting for almost half of all products, and provided both in FS and HF configurations.PES, PE and PP membranes were also found to be available in FS and HF configurations respectively.Although polymeric membranes enjoy some advantages, being easy to foul is their weakness, which is associated with their hydrophobic characteristic.However, the hydrophobic membrane weakness can be improved by coating the membrane using hydrophilic materials. 52,69,70

MBR for the Treatment of Pulp and Paper Industry Wastewater
The pollution of land, water and air is an important problem caused by rapid growth of population and the demand for industrial establishments to fulfill human requirements.It has been estimated that the pulp and paper industry is responsible for 50% of all wastes dumped into the environment.In pulp and paper industry, water recycling has been emphasized due to the massive amount of water consumed.The treatment of pulp and paper wastewater by conventional methods, such as coagulation and AS process contains various nonbiodegradable organics, inorganic and color materials and therefore, the effluent quality does not meet the regulations. 18egarding high temperature of pulp and paper wastewater (50-70ºC), thermophilic treatment was used for energy saving and reduction of operational costs.Several studies have been conducted to compare the performances of thermophilic treatment with mesophilic treatment.The results showed that thermophilic treatment can produce comparable permeate quality. 32,71An integrated thermophilic submerged aerobic membrane bioreactor (TSAMBR) and electrochemical oxidation (EO) technology were developed for TMP treatment.Cake formation was identified as the dominant mechanism of membrane fouling.The EO of the TSAMBR permeate was performed and a complete decolorization was achieved.The COD removal efficiency increased to about 96.2-98.2%.Results illustrated that the high-quality effluent produced by the TSAMBR-EO system can be reused as process water for system closure in pulp and paper mill. 6An application of submerged FS MBR modules to treat circuit wastewater from the paper industry was evaluated.The thermophilic MBR process showed to be reliable for use as in-mill technology for wastewater reuse in the pulp and paper industry. 72In general, the higher temperature results in higher substrate degradation rates because of faster reaction kinetics and increase of specific biomass growth rates and a lower net sludge yield is observed due to an increased endogenous respiration rate of the microorganisms.The poor sludge settleability is one of the main drawbacks of this technique.It is assumed that the reason was the difference in the species of microorganisms, especially a greater number of filamentous bacteria in the population. 73,74ecently, usage of membrane separation technology, as an alternative way for the treatment of the paper mill wastewater, has attracted attention because of energy efficiency, footprint reduction and simple operation.Many reports have demonstrated the application of membrane technology in the wastewater treatment of pulp and paper mills. 75plication of Aerobic MBR An ultrafiltration system and an external membrane bioreactor were applied to compare TSS, TDS and COD removal efficiencies for mechanical newsprint mill wastewater.In all cases, the MBR had higher removal efficiencies than the ultrafiltration system.The MBR demonstrated 48-58% removal of total COD, 35%-45% removal of dissolved COD, 25%-35% removal of total solids (TS) and 20-30% removal of TDS. 76oul condensates from kraft pulp mills were treated in an immersed membrane bioreactor which was fed continuously and total reduced sulphur and methanol removals were obtained in the mesophilic temperature range.As the temperature increased, a reduction in efficiency was observed.The results showed that the treatment of kraft pulp mill foul condensates at high temperatures using a membrane bioreactor could be technically feasible and has good potential for industrial application. 32Wastewater of the paper industry was affected by integrated treatment consisting of MBR and an oxidation step.Screening tests with different types of oxidation showed that ozonation after biological treatment could reduce the COD by 40% and BOD/COD ratio could be increased up to 0.19.Based on results, an integrated treatment system was designed with recirculation of MBR effluent during ozonation.The economic evaluation showed that the integrated chemical and biological treatment is costly for the pulp and paper industry. 77The treatment of paper mill wastewater by MBR system in order to obtain high quality effluent for sustainable reclamation and reuse was studied.
Results showed that the COD and BOD reduction was 86% and 98% respectively.In addition, both TKN and ammonia was reduced by 90% and the TSS in the effluent was always lower than 5 mg/L. 78,79

Application of Anaerobic MBR
The study has been done on a full-scale AS plant compared to an MBR with flat sheets membranes.Both systems received their feed from an anaerobic bioreactor treating paper mill wastewater.MBR produced an effluent with higher quality than AS in terms of SS.Other effluent quality specifications, such as organic matter, phosphorus and nitrogen compounds, did not show substantial differences between AS and MBR.Fouling due to calcium carbonate scaling and formation of biofilm layer on the membrane caused high reduction of flux and therefore required proper and more complicated maintenance than the AS system.The results showed that, for paper mill wastewater, after anaerobic biotreatment, if there is no need for excellent effluent quality in terms of suspended solids, the replacement of the AS by the MBR would not be strongly justified, mainly because of maintenance cost. 33 study on the thermophilic anaerobic digestion of highstrength kraft pulp wastewater has been performed.The system consisted of an MF membrane module for oily substances removal, a stripping system for removal of sulfur compounds, an anaerobic packed fixed-bed bioreactor with pumice stone for methane fermentation and an UF membrane module for retention of a high density of microorganisms.In a continuous run with only the MF membrane module for oily substances removal, the digester efficiency decreased because of methanogenic inhibition by sulfur compounds.After fitting the stripping system which used evolved gas from the digester, more than 80% of the inhibitive sulfur compounds were removed and high loading and high efficiency operation could be reached. 80he external AnMBRs for pulp and paper wastewater treatment was used, which provided an excellent quality permeate for reuse and eliminated the impact of sludge deflocculation on the quality of treated effluent.It appears that submerged AnMBR technology has a bright future for pulp and paper effluent treatment to recover energy and achieve closed cycle operation and therefor lower cost than aerobic treatments. 81he effects of pH on the MBR performance and membrane fouling of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating thermo mechanical pulping wastewater were investigated.Changes in COD removal, biogas production, sludge and cake layer properties and their correlations on membrane fouling were investigated before and after pH shocks.The results showed that a pH 8.0 shock had a low impact, while pH 9.1 and 10.0 shocks exerted significant long-lasting negative impacts on COD removal, biogas production and membrane filtration performance.The elevated pH shocks induced the dispersion of sludge flocs and resulted in the collection of colloids and biopolymers in the sludge suspension and thus declined membrane performance.Statistical analysis showed that the ratio of proteins to polysaccharides in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) had a negative effect on the membrane fouling rate.There were smaller size particles deposited on the membrane surface and a more compact and denser cake layer was formed after being exposed to an alkaline shock at pH 10, resulting in higher membrane fouling rates. 82

MBR Fouling Evaluation
Membrane fouling in wastewater treatment processes, such as MBR system, can be generally characterized as initial pore clogging followed by foulant layer formation.Foulant layer can be further distinguished as gel layer and cake layer.][85] In the biological process, EPS are released by microorganisms during substrate metabolism, biomass growth and biomass decay.Main factor related to MBR fouling is EPS and then these organic molecules deposit onto the membrane surface and these organics are generally forming a colloidal layer on the membrane. 86A low concentration of EPS in inlet wastewater might have negative impact on MBR performance for floc decomposition, and therefore, a minimum amount of EPS should be available in the wastewater for sustainable performance of MBR process. 87Studies depicted organic substances caused increase in sludge viscosity and therefore increase in filtration resistance, which is attributed to the attachment of EPS onto the membrane surface.EPS is generally categorized into two types, namely bound and soluble EPS.Bound EPS involves capsules, sheaths, loosely bound polymers and attached organic materials and soluble EPS is referred to soluble microbial products (SMPs), which mainly consists of low to high molecular weight proteins, protein-like substances, polysaccharides and polysaccharidelike substances.9][90] The effects of EPS on the AS rheology were investigated in a submerged membrane bioreactor operated at different SRT values and different carbon to nitrogen ratios (C/N) of feed wastewater.Operational parameters such as MLSS, protein fraction of EPS (EPS p ), carbohydrate fraction of EPS (EPS c ), protein fraction of SMP (SMP p ), carbohydrate fraction of SMP (SMP c ), apparent viscosity, critical flux and hydrophobicity in mixed liquor and their correlations were investigated.The results showed that the C/N ratio of feed, SRT, MLSS and SMP c were found to have positive effects on apparent viscosity at 3 different shear rates.On the other hand, a negative effect was detected between the apparent viscosities and the critical fluxes.It was also observed that there is a significant positive correlation between hydrophobicity and both EPS p and SMP p . 91ritical flux is a value of flux that exists as irreversible deposit and there is no fouling below the critical flux.Critical flux happens when a thick cake layer forms on the membrane and fouling could happen when the flux is above critical flux.With regard to critical flux, the suitable flux for the operation can be defined based on the TMP sustainability. 92The deposition of biopolymers on the membrane surface could change the specification of the membrane and then cause severe membrane fouling and also increasing of biopolymer concentration in sludge suspension.This could increase the viscosity and effectively make a barrier for the permeation. 93tudies have also showed a direct effect of carbohydrate concentrations on MBR fouling and it was found that carbohydrate molecules had a higher fouling propensity than protein molecules.This was associated with the hydrophobic and smaller size of protein molecules compered to carbohydrate. 94embrane fouling was investigated in a novel airlift oxidation ditch membrane bioreactor (AOXMBR) working under various OLRs.The results showed the high performance of AOXMBR in terms of COD removal, even at very high OLRs.In addition, the study confirmed that the performance of the AOXMBR was better in comparison with the conventional AS.Moreover, on-line viability measurement of the AS showed that the fouling increased with reducing AS viability.The results illustrated that the qualitative change of the AS affected the membrane fouling.The membrane fouling dynamics analysis showed the relationship between the reason of membrane fouling and MBR operating condition.Adsorption in pores appeared to be the dominant reason when biofilm or deposit was not available on the membrane surface. 95nMBR, compared to aerobic MBR, has higher propensity to foul and therefore, requires a long SRT which could lead to worse internal pore blocking possibly for higher concentrations of responsible foulants, such as protein and carbohydrate molecules in SMPs. 96Since SRT controls the MLSS concentration, it has an effect on membrane fouling.Generally, longer SRT in MBR system assists in increasing the MLSS concentration and thereby, reduces the biotreatment tank size and promotes the development of specific nitrifying bacteria.8][99] It has been clarified that high concentrations of MLSS are related to the high viscosity of mixed liquor and therefor significantly contribute to the membrane fouling.In addition, longer SRT leads to producing a higher concentration of protein and carbohydrate molecules in SMP and subsequently increasing the membrane fouling. 100,101he total hydraulic membrane resistance (R t ) was calculated according to Darcy law (Eq.1): Where ΔP, μ p and J are the TMP, permeate dynamic viscosity and the constant permeate flux, respectively.A common approach is to interpret the overall resistance R t as the sum of 4 individual resistances, all of which depend on time and experimental conditions.The expression can be explained as (Eq.2): R m is the clean membrane resistance, R p is the hydraulic resistance attributed to pore blocking, R c is the hydraulic resistance attributed to the cake layer and R f is the resistances caused by concentration polarization.
The values of these different resistances were obtained after specific membrane cleaning procedures.The method of measuring the membrane resistances is as follows: the flux and TMP of the new membrane module in tap water are measured before the MBR operation.Then, Rm is obtained from Eq. (1, 2) after the MBR operation, the flux and the TMP of the membrane module are measured leading to calculation of Rt.The module is submerged in tap water for calculation of R c + R p + R m .Then the module was rinsed under tap water to calculate R p + R m . 95 lab-scale filtration cell was used to find out the optimum relaxation time for MBR membranes.The sludge obtained from several plants was analyzed with fixed filtration times and intermittent relaxations of decreasing durations.Test on the lab-scale filtration cell and a pilot MBR showed that the highest net flux was obtained with the same relaxation time, which indicates that the lab-scale filtration cell can be used to optimize the relaxation time in large-scale MBR systems.The permeate flux was obviously higher in the lab-scale filtration cell than the MBR system due to irreversible fouling in the pilot MBR.Mathematical simulations indicated that approximately 85% of the membrane area in the pilot MBR plant was blocked during operation.The results revealed that the lab-scale filtration cell can be applied independently to check both sludge filterability and membrane condition in full-scale MBR systems, and the optimal relaxation time for large-scale MBRs can be determined in lab-scale systems. 102BR was continuously operated to investigate fouling mechanisms caused by gel layer formation.Agar was applied as a model foulant for gel layer formation, and filtration resistance of gel layers was evaluated.The results illustrated that gel layer possessed unusually high specific filtration resistance and high measured porosity compared with cake layer.A new fouling mechanism based on Flory-Huggins theory was proposed.Filtration resistance of agar gel layer was discovered to be independent from pH and ionic strength, but linearly increase with gel thickness.Simulation of the mechanism model showed that the filtration resistance induced by mixing chemical potential variation was comparable to experimental data of filtration resistance of gel layer, indicating that the proposed mechanism is the predominant one responsible for the high filtration resistance of gel layer 103 .A new model was also proposed as a numerical tool to predict the deposit mass composition of SS and SMP on the membrane surface in an AnMBR.This approach offered interesting perspectives for fouling prediction and the on-line control of an AnMBR process. 104

Control of MBR
Generally, the process control of MBR is a complicated task because the biological performance can be affected by type of wastewater, membrane selectivity and operating conditions, such as SRT, HRT, F/M ratio and membrane permeate flux.
The performance of treatment process is related to microbial quantity and quality.Therefore, application of a suitable method for monitoring these microbial key parameters is critical to effective treatment of wastewater. 105,106onsidering cells viability and reactivity concepts, more information on the state and nature of AS could be obtained.The usage of an on-line capacitance sensor for obtaining information about the biological state of the AS in an MBR was successfully investigated.Determination of MLSS or MLVSS in AS systems is not really a good indicator of the biological state of the process, and therefore, the quality of cells should also be considered.The preliminary results on biomass monitoring of AS by a capacitive sensor are in favor of its application in wastewater treatment plants. 1079][110] Coagulation is a necessary pretreatment step to remove micro-particles in aqueous suspension before a conventional sedimentation and a membrane filtration. 111olyaluminium chloride coagulant has been compared with other adsorbents, such as powdered activated carbon (PAC), zeolite and polyamide.Results showed that coagulant, compared to mentioned adsorbents, considerably decreased the membrane fouling. 112The flocculation performances of nine cationic and anionic polyacrylamides with different molecular weights and charge densities in the pretreatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater have been investigated.Based on the cost evaluation, the use of the polyacrylamides is economically feasible to treat the pulp and paper mill wastewater.This result suggests that single polymer system can be used alone in the coagulation-flocculation process due to the efficiency of the polyacrylamide 113 .The flocculation performances of polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride with different molecular weight in the treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater were evaluated.The effectiveness of the flocculation was measured based on the reduction of the turbidity, TSS, COD and zeta potential measurements.Results illustrated that the flocculation performance of higher molecular weight samples was more efficient compared with that of lower molecular weights.This might be due to the bridging mechanism, which occurred concurrently with the charge neutralization effect during flocculation. 114The hybrid PAC-MBR system decreased the amount of membrane fouling and steadily increased the removal performance of etodolac.PAC addition reduced the deposition of EPS and organic matter on the membrane surface and resulted in an increase in COD removal, even at higher OLRs with low PAC addition.Membrane fouling mechanisms were evaluated using combined adsorption fouling models.Modified fouling index values and normalized mass transfer coefficient values indicated that cake adsorption was the predominant fouling mechanism. 115The effect of PAC on fouling reduction in anaerobic MBR has been analyzed, and it has been reported that the performance of membrane in anaerobic MBR was enhanced after PAC addition.The mechanism of PAC for fouling reduction was due to adsorption of solutes and colloids in the supernatant and enlarged floc size due to incorporation of PAC into the bioflocs.Nevertheless, it has also been found that the PAC overdose could become a foulant and led to an increase in the membrane fouling. 116The effect of PAC and GAC on the performance of anaerobic MBR systems has been investigated.Results showed the addition of PAC compared to GAC led to greater removal of COD due to the higher surface area of PAC. 117

Industrial Applications and Economic Investigation
It was predicted that, by 2019, more than 5 million m 3 /d of wastewater would be treated by MBR process in the world.The Henriksdal wastewater treatment plant in Stockholm will be upgraded with an MBR, which will be able to treat 864 000 m 3 /d of wastewater.The mentioned plant is the largest MBR plant in the world.In 2004, when the Nordkanal MBR plant was commissioned, it was the largest MBR plant having a design capacity of 45000 m 3 /d.This increase in the treatment capacity between the Nordkanal and the Henriksdal plants shows the significant growth of MBR technology. 118,119In addition, membrane prices have significantly decreased during the last 15 years, and therefore, MBR technology has become a more attractive solution for medium-sized plants, having a population equivalent of 10 000-100 000.Furthermore, substantial progress has been accomplished in the design and operation optimization of MBR systems, which has helped to reduce the capital and operating costs of MBR plants.In 2008, a 22.4% compound annual growth rate was predicted for the world MBR market for the period 2008-2018.The global market for MBRs was $425.7 million in 2014 and is projected to approach $777.7 million by 2019, registering a compound annual growth rate of 12.8% in the period 2014-2019. 119

Conclusions
MBR can be effectively applied as a post treatment unit in pulp and paper wastewater treatment for the removal of organics, nutrients and microorganisms and its application is an emerging technology.With more studies being conducted on the MBR systems, this technology is an excellent alternative to conventional methods for industrial wastewater treatment so that clarified effluent could be produced.The application of MBR is necessary for long SRT, physical retention and subsequent hydrolysis to achieve the biological degradation of contaminants.New developments in this technology are expected to cause excellent solutions for treatment of recalcitrant industrial wastewater.

Table 2 .
Performance of Different Aerobic, Anaerobic and Hybrid Processes in the Pulp And Paper Wastewater Treatment