A Review of Dietary Probiotics in Poultry

Document Type: Review Article

Authors

Applied Microbiology Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The use of probiotics has rapidly grown in recent years, enhancing the performance of broilers and leading to the production of products free of any probiotic trace. Recent evidence suggests that the use of microbial probiotics can play a significant role in the future of the poultry industry. Although this method is not complete yet, it can be employed by human societies as a useful tool to maximize poultry products, enhance the health, and ensure the safety of food sources. Some reports show that the application of probiotics in the feed of broilers can lead to positive outcomes such as increased weight and improved feed conversion ratio (FCR).

Keywords


  1. Imani Fooladi AA, Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini H, Nourani MR, Khani S, Alavian SM. Probiotic as a novel treatment strategy against liver disease. Hepat Mon. 2013;13(2):e7521. doi:10.5812/ hepatmon.7521.
  2. Khani S, Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini H, Taheri M, Nourani MR, Imani Fooladi AA. Probiotics as an alternative strategy for prevention and treatment of human diseases: a review. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2012;11(2):79-89.
  3. Khani S, Motamedifar M, Golmoghaddam H, Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini H, Hashemizadeh Z. In vitro study of the effect of a probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus against herpes simplex virus type 1. Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16(2):129-135.
  4. Afshar Mazandaran N, Rajab A. Probiotics and their use in animal and poultry diets. Tehran: Noorbakhsh; 2001. [Persian].
  5. Stavric S, Kornegay ET. Microbial probiotics for pigs and poultry. In: Wallace RJ, Chesson A, eds. Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding. Wiley; 2008:205. doi:10.1002/9783527615353. ch10.
  6. Fuller R. History and development of probiotics. In: Fuller R, ed. Probiotics: The scientific basis. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1992:1-8.
  7. Markowiak P, Śliżewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):1021. doi:10.3390/nu9091021.
  8. Pournazari M, AA-Qotbi A, Seidavi A, Corazzin M. Prebiotics, probiotics and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) for broilers: performance, carcass traits and blood. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua. 2017;30(1):3- 10. doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.v30n1a01.
  9. Vahabi-Asil O, Bouyeh M, Qotbi A, et al. Effects of a prebiotic on growth performance, blood parameters and immunity response of turkeys fed low protein diets. Eur Poult Sci. 2017;81. doi:10.1399/ eps.2017.196.
  10. Karimi-Kivi R, Dadashbeiki M, Seidavi A. Growth, body characteristics and blood parameters of ostrich chickens receiving commercial probiotics. Span J Agric Res. 2015;13(1):1-11. doi:10.5424/sjar/2015131-6146.
  11. Kaur IP, Chopra K, Saini A. Probiotics: potential pharmaceutical applications. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2002;15(1):1-9.
  12. Kabir SML, Rahman MM, Rahman MB. Potentiation of probiotics in promoting microbiological meat quality of broilers. J Bangladesh Soc Agric Sci Technol. 2005;2(3-4):93-96.
  13. Kizerwetter-Swida M, Binek M. Protective effect of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strain on infection with pathogenic bacteria in chickens. Pol J Vet Sci. 2009;12(1):15-20.
  14. Yoon C, Na CS, Park JH, Han SK, Nam YM, Kwon JT. Effect of feeding multiple probiotics on performance and fecal noxious gas emission in broiler chicks. Korean J Poult Sci. 2004;31(4):229-235.
  15. Awad WA, Bohm J, Razzazi-Fazeli E, Ghareeb K, Zentek J. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2006;85(6):974- 979. doi:10.1093/ps/85.6.974.
  16. Apata D. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune response of broiler chicks fed diets supplemented with a culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. J Sci Food Agric. 2008;88(7):1253-1258. doi:10.1002/jsfa.3214.
  17. Nayebpor M, Farhomand P, Hashemi A. Effects of different levels of direct fed microbial (Primalac) on growth performance and humoral immune response in broiler chickens. J Anim Vet Adv. 2007;6(11):1308-1313.
  18. Brisbin JT, Zhou H, Gong J, et al. Gene expression profiling of chicken lymphoid cells after treatment with Lactobacillus acidophilus cellular components. Dev Comp Immunol. 2008;32(5):563-574. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2007.09.003.
  19. Rantala M, Nurmi E. Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. Br Poult Sci. 1973;14(6):627-630. doi:10.1080/00071667308416073.
  20. Nurmi E, Rantala M. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature. 1973;241(5386):210-211. doi:10.1038/241210a0.
  21. Stern NJ, Cox NA, Bailey JS, Berrang ME, Musgrove MT. Comparison of mucosal competitive exclusion and competitive exclusion treatment to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2001;80(2):156-160. doi:10.1093/ps/80.2.156.
  22. Nisbet DJ, Tellez GI, Lowry VK, et al. Effect of a commercial competitive exclusion culture (Preempt) on mortality and horizontal transmission of Salmonella gallinarum in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 1998;42(4):651-656.
  23. Fritts CA, Kersey JH, Motl MA, et al. Bacillus subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin) improves live performance and microbiological status of broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res. 2000;9(2):149-155. doi:10.1093/japr/9.2.149.
  24. Line JE, Bailey JS, Cox NA, Stern NJ, Tompkins T. Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers. Poult Sci. 1998;77(3):405-410. doi:10.1093/ ps/77.3.405.
  25. Marteau P, Rambaud JC. Potential of using lactic acid bacteria for therapy and immunomodulation in man. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993;12(1-3):207-220.
  26. Duke G. Avian digestion. Physiology of Domestic Animals. 1977;9:313-320.
  27. Sissons JW. Potential of probiotic organisms to prevent diarrhoea and promote digestion in farm animals-a review. J Sci Food Agric. 1989;49(1):1-13. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740490102.
  28. Dierick NA. Biotechnology aids to improve feed and feed digestion: enzymes and fermentation. Arch Anim Nutr. 1989;39(3):241-261. doi:10.1080/17450398909429530.
  29. Chiang SH, Hsieh WM. Effect of direct-fed microorganisms on broiler growth performance and litter ammonia level. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 1995;8(2):159-162. doi:10.5713/ ajas.1995.159.
  30. Yeo J, Kim KI. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 1997;76(2):381-385. doi:10.1093/ ps/76.2.381.
  31. Kumprecht I, Zobac P. The effect of probiotic preparations containing Saccharomyces cerevisae and Enterococcus faecium in diets with different levels of beta-vitamins on chicken broiler performance. Czech Journal of Animal Science-UZPI (Czech Republic). 1998;43:63-70.
  32. Tannock GW. Probiotic properties of lactic-acid bacteria: plenty of scope for fundamental R & D. Trends Biotechnol. 1997;15(7):270- 274.
  33. McCartney AL, Wenzhi W, Tannock GW. Molecular analysis of the composition of the bifidobacterial and lactobacillus microflora of humans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(12):4608-4613.
  34. Freter R. Factors affecting the microecology of the gut. In: Probiotics: The scientific basis. Dordrecht: Springer; 1992:111- 144.
  35. Chateau N, Castellanos I, Deschamps AM. Distribution of pathogen inhibition in the Lactobacillus isolates of a commercial probiotic consortium. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993;74(1):36-40.
  36. Fijan S. Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: an overview of recent literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(5):4745-4767. doi:10.3390/ijerph110504745.
  37. Garriga M, Pascual M, Monfort JM, Hugas M. Selection of lactobacilli for chicken probiotic adjuncts. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84(1):125-132.
  38. Blankenship LC, Bailey JS, Cox NA, Stern NJ, Brewer R, Williams O. Two-step mucosal competitive exclusion flora treatment to diminish salmonellae in commercial broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 1993;72(9):1667-1672. doi:10.3382/ps.0721667.
  39. Tortuero F. Influence of the implantation of Lactobacillus acidophilus in chicks on the growth, feed conversion, malabsorption of fats syndrome and intestinal flora. Poult Sci. 1973;52(1):197-203. doi:10.3382/ps.0520197.
  40. Szylit O, Champ M, Ait-Abdelkader N, Raibaud P. [Role of five Lactobacillus strains on carbohydrate degradation in monoxenic chickens]. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1980;20(5b):1701-1706.
  41. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaudin S. Influence of dried Bacillus substillis and lactobacilli cultures on intestinal microflora and performance in broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 1996;9(4):397- 404. doi:10.5713/ajas.1996.397.
  42. Collington GK, Parker DS, Armstrong DG. The influence of inclusion of either an antibiotic or a probiotic in the diet on the development of digestive enzyme activity in the pig. Br J Nutr. 1990;64(1):59-70.
  43. Goldin B, Gorbach SL. Alterations in fecal microflora enzymes related to diet, age, Lactobacillus supplements, and dimethylhydrazine. Cancer. 1977;40(5 Suppl):2421-2426.
  44. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. The effect of milk and lactobacillus feeding on human intestinal bacterial enzyme activity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;39(5):756-761. doi:10.1093/ajcn/39.5.756.
  45. Cole CB, Anderson PH, Philips SM, Fuller R, Hewitt D. The effect of yoghurt on the growth, lactose-utilizing gut organisms and β-glucuronidase activity of caecal contents of a lactose-fed, lactase-deficient animal. Food Microbiol. 1984;1(3):217-222. doi:10.1016/0740-0020(84)90037-6.
  46. Cole CB, Fuller R, Newport MJ. The effect of diluted yoghurt on the gut microbiology and growth of piglets. Food Microbiol. 1987;4(1):83-85. doi:10.1016/0740-0020(87)90021-9.
  47. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW. Production variables and nutrient retention in single comb White Leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbials. Poult Sci. 1994;73(11):1699-1711. doi:10.3382/ps.0731699.
  48. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW. Effect of direct fed microbials on nutrient retention and production parameters of single comb white leghorn pullets. Poult Sci. 1993;72(Suppl 2):87.
  49. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW. Effects of direct fed microbials on nutrient retention and parameters of laying pullets. Poult Sci. 1992;71(Suppl 1):111.
  50. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW. Performance of Single Comb White Leghorn fed a diet supplemented with a live microbial during the growth and egg laying phases. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996;57(1-2):25-38. doi:10.1016/0377-8401(95)00852-7.
  51. Stuart RL, Surprise HC, Davis LW. Response of growing rats to diets supple mented with a liquid, non-viable, Lactobacillus fermentation product. J Anim Sci. 1978;47:322.
  52. Schwab CG, Moore JJ, Hoyt PM, Prentice JL. Performance and fecal flora of calves fed a nonviable Lactobacillus bulgaricus fermentation product. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63(9):1412-1423. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83098-0.
  53. Perdigon G, Alvarez S, Rachid M, Aguero G, Gobbato N. Immune system stimulation by probiotics. J Dairy Sci. 1995;78(7):1597- 1606. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76784-4.
  54. Perdigon G, Alvarez S, Nader-Macias ME, Roux ME, de Ruiz Holgado AP. The oral administration of lactic acid bacteria increase the mucosal intestinal immunity in response to enteropathogens. J Food Prot. 1990;53(5):404-410. doi:10.4315/0362- 028x-53.5.404.
  55. Dunham HJ, Laster SM, Edens FW, Casas IA, Dobrogosz WJ. Immunomodulation of stressor-associated diseases in neonate chickens and turkeys by gastrointestinal colonization with Lactobacillus reuteri. J Immunol 1993;150:A197-A197.
  56. Hosseini Z, Nassiri Moghaddam H, Kermanshahi H, Kalidari GA. Effect of probiotic (Bifidobacterum and Streptococcus) on performance and serum parameters of broiler chickens. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2012;4:1-6.
  57. Mahajan P, Sahoo J, Panda PC. Effect of probiotic (Lacto-Sacc) feeding, packaging methods and seasons on the microbial and organoleptic qualities of chicken meat balls during refrigerated storage. J Food Sci Technol (Mysore). 2000;37(1):67-71.
  58. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult Sci. 1998;77(9):1259-1265. doi:10.1093/ps/77.9.1259.
  59. Midilli M, Tuncer SD. The effects of enzyme and probiotic supplementation to diets on broiler performance. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2001;25(6):895-903.
  60. Kabir SML, Rahman MM, Rahman MB, Rahman MM, Ahmed SU. The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Int J Poult Sci. 2004;3(5):361-364. doi:10.3923/ijps.2004.361.364.
  61. Khbaksefidi A, Rahimi SH. Evaluation of the effect various levels of probiotic on blood factors, performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks under acute heat stress. Agric Sci Technol. 2004;18(2):149-158.
  62. Karimi K, Rahimi SH. The effect of various levels of probiotic on performance of broilr chicks. Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi. 2003;16(60):90-94. [Persian].
  63. Kafilzadeh F, Safari Parvar MR. The effect of feeding different levels of immunobac probiotic on the performance of broilers. J Agric Sci Nat Resour. 2003;9(4):173-184.
  64. Beheshti Moghadam MH, Rezaei M, Niknafs F, Sayyahzadeh H. Effect of combined probiotic and organic acid on some blood parameters and immune system of broiler chicks. Proceedings of the 2nd Mediterranean Summit of World Poultry Science Association; Antalya, Turkey; 2009:4-7.
  65. Rowghani E, Arab M, Akbarian A. Effects of a probiotic and other feed additives on performance and immune response of broiler chicks. Int J Poult Sci. 2007;6(4):261-265. doi:10.3923/ ijps.2007.261.265.
  66. Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS, Tamim NM, Shellem TA, Doerr JA. Induction of local protective immunity to Eimeria acervulina by a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;28(5-6):351-361. doi:10.1016/j.cimid.2005.09.001.
  67. Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, et al. Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12(12):1387-1392. doi:10.1128/ cdli.12.12.1387-1392.2005.
  68. Khaksefidi A, Ghoorchi T. Effect of probiotic on performance and immunocompetence in broiler chicks. J Poult Sci. 2006;43(3):296- 300. doi:10.2141/jpsa.43.296.
  69. Gharib Naseri K, Rahimi S, Khaki P. Comparison of the effects of probiotic, organic acid and medicinal plant on Campylobacter jejuni challenged broiler chickens. J Agric Sci Technol. 2012;14:1485-1496.
  70. Kabir SML. Effect of probiotics on broiler meat quality. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(15):3623-3627.
  71. Loddi MM, Gonzales E, Takita TS, Mendes AA, Roca Rde O. Effect of the use of probiotic and antibiotic on the performance, yield and carcass quality of broilers. Rev Bras Zootec. 2000;29(4):1124- 1131. doi:10.1590/S1516-35982000000400025.
  72. Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2005;84(7):1015-1021. doi:10.1093/ps/84.7.1015.